Archived
Obama Calls Out Dark Money. So Why Won’t He Act?
Yesterday, President Obama traveled to Illinois to deliver a speech on the “better politics” he described last month in his final State of the Union. The main thrust? In order…
Archived
Disclosure is the foundation of campaign finance regulation. Being able to follow the money in our elections allows the public to hold those who give it and spend it responsible. Money matters – and society should be able to see where it goes.
Essentially, disclosure requirements are in place to show who is giving money in politics, whether that money comes from an individual or group, and how the entity spends the money. As the cost of elections increases, disclosure laws allow the public to see where all this cash is coming from.
For federal elections, disclosure reports go to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the body tasked with enforcing the nation’s campaign laws, which makes them available online for public consumption. States and localities have their own election commissions that handle campaign forms for the elections in those areas.
Disclosure requirements aren’t anywhere near uniform, though, which is one of the reasons why new reforms are necessary. There are different requirements based on who is giving the money, how much is given, and if the money is contributed to the campaign itself, or to an independent political group.
The piecemeal nature of campaign finance law and related jurisprudence, which has produced the alphabet and numerical soup that defines the current campaign landscape, with 501s, 527s, and PACs, has led to a system of confusing, divergent regulations.
Disclosure reform is possible, and necessary, but it is not the end-all solution to our election woes. Transparency only goes so far, and limiting the money gushing into elections is just as important as making it visible. As campaign finance expert Lawrence Lessig once explained, comparing the issue to the BP oil spill, “[t]he point is to stop the guck from pouring into the Gulf, not to see it more clearly.”
Making our campaign disclosure requirements more transparent, uniform, and enforceable is something we need to do as a part of our broader efforts to change money’s role in politics. In the next installment of Solutions 101, we’ll describe in more detail the disclosure regime that currently exists at the federal level and in states across the country.
Archived
Yesterday, President Obama traveled to Illinois to deliver a speech on the “better politics” he described last month in his final State of the Union. The main thrust? In order…
Archived
Yesterday Governor Jeb Bush made headlines by saying, “If I could do it all again I’d eliminate the Supreme Court ruling,” referring to Citizens United. He added, “I would turn…
Archived
In one of the most exciting moments of the entire 2016 campaign, Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders made the case for why money in politics reform is issue…