Analysis

Vote Recommendation: VOTE NO on the KIDS Act

Falsely-Named KIDS Act Places Big Tech Above Children and Their Families


Congress is trying to fast-track H.R. 7757, the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act via suspension, which would limit debate and speed up passage in the House of Representatives.

The KIDS Act would roll back years of bipartisan progress on kids’ online safety — and could set a damaging precedent for AI legislation as well. Issue One, along with more than 90 other kids’ safety organizations who have worked on the bill for years, urges Congress to vote NO.

The Senate’s Kids Online Safety Act passed 91-3 with strong bipartisan support. The House version, now rolled into the KIDS Act, is significantly weaker, and strips out protections related to eating disorders, depression, addiction, and suicide.

Here are five immediate concerns:

No real safeguards on platform design.

The bill cuts the Senate’s duty of care — the legal requirement for platforms to be safe-by-default and to avoid designs that foster mental health harms, sexual exploitation, or financial exploitation of minors.

Policies instead of protections — and even those are gutted.

The House bill replaces enforceable rules with a vague requirement to “maintain policies.” It also removes the Senate bill’s specific obligation to address eating disorders, substance use, suicidal behavior, depression, and addiction. Companies wouldn’t be required to have a policy on these harms, let alone a legal duty to prevent them — a painful omission for families who have lost children to these exact harms.

Weaker protections against compulsive use.

The bill raises the bar for what counts as “harm” before safeguards kick in, and drops the Senate bill’s explicit requirement for a chronological feed option.

A narrower set of covered platforms.

The House bill strips out video games, messaging apps, and video streaming services as covered platforms. It adds a tangle of social media exemptions that potentially allow platforms like Roblox — long scrutinized for sexual and financial exploitation — to argue they’re not covered at all.

A pass for abusive AI chatbots.

Instead of a duty of care or real liability for harmful AI companions, the bill only requires chatbot providers to maintain “reasonable policies” on a narrow set of issues. On addiction specifically, the only intervention is a prompt suggesting a break after three uninterrupted hours of use — weaker than voluntary limits some social media companies have already adopted.

Since the bill’s inception, we have worked energetically to support the bill and the efforts of its bipartisan co-sponsors in the House and Senate. But the KIDS Act is not a stronger path forward. It is a gutted version of the bill families fought for — weakened behind closed doors while parents, survivors, and youth advocates were shut out of the process.

We want strong kids’ online safety legislation to pass. But this is not it. The House must not advance a bill that strips out the very protections families came to Congress to demand